Menghadap Timur Dan Barat Ketika Buang Hajat (Kajian Kritik Hadis Dengan Pendekatan Geografis)

Zaeni Anwar; Triyanti Nurkhikmah; Mukhamad Iskhak Nawawi; Umiatu Rohmah; Muhammad Rizky Fadillah; Umar Abdul Aziz

doi:10.37348/cendekia.v11i2.844

Authors

Zaeni Anwar Universitas PTIQ Jakarta, Indonesia
Triyanti Nurkhikmah Universitas PTIQ Jakarta, Indonesia
Mukhamad Iskhak Nawawi Universitas PTIQ Jakarta, Indonesia
Umiatu Rohmah Universitas PTIQ Jakarta, Indonesia
Muhammad Rizky Fadillah UIN Syarif Hidayatullah Jakarta
Umar Abdul Aziz STAI Nurul Iman, Indonesia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.37348/cendekia.v11i2.844

Keywords:

Defecate, Hadith Criticism, Facing East and West, Geographical Approach

Abstract

This study discusses the hadith about the prohibition of facing or turning our backs to the east and west when defecating. This study is interesting because so far the hadith has often been understood textually without considering geographical factors and the direction of the qibla in various regions. This study uses a hadith criticism approach with a geographical perspective to understand the context of the emergence of hadith as well as its relevance in various places. Data was collected through a literature review of the main hadith books and several explanations of classical and contemporary scholars. The results of the study show that the prohibition is very contextual, especially related to the position of the Qibla. In the context of Indonesia, the east and west directions are not the direction of the Qibla, so its application needs to consider the geographical location of each place. Thus, this hadith does not only regulate the manners of defecation, but also shows the flexibility of Islamic law that takes into account the conditions of space and place. In conclusion, the understanding of hadith needs to consider the geographical context so that its teachings remain relevant and do not lose the value of the wisdom contained in it.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Addzaky, Khoirul Umam. “Kritik Hadist Perspektif Muhammad Syuhudi Ismail.” Multidisciplinary Indosesian Center Journal 1, no. 2 (2024): 887–96. https://doi.org/10.62567/micjo.v1i2.

Al-‘Asqalani, Ibn Hajar. “Tahdzib Al-Tahdzib, Juz 2.” Beirut: Dar al-Kutub al-Ilmiyah, 2004.

Al-bukhori, Abu ‘Abdillah Muhammad bin Isma’il. Sahih Bukhari, Juz 1. Damaskus: Dar Ibn Katsir, 1993.

Al-Gharābilī, Muḥammad ibn Qāsim. “Fatḥ Al-Qarīb Al-Mujīb Fī Sharḥ Alfāẓ Al-Taqrīb.” Beirut: Dār ibn Ḥazm, 2005.

Al-Kasani, ’Ala ad-Din Abu Bakar bin Mas’ud. Bada’i Al-Sana’i Fii Tartibi as-Syarai’. Beirut: Dar al-Ilmiyah, n.d.

Al-Mizzi, Jamaluddin. “Tahdzib Al-Kamal Fi Asma Al-Rijal, Juz 26.” Beirut: Muassasah al-Risalah, 1987.

Al-Nasai, Abu ‘Abd al-Rahman Ahmad bin Syu’aib. “Sunan Al-Nasai, Juz 1.” Dar al-Risalah al-‘Alamiyah, 2018.

Al-Qusyairiy, Abu al-Husain Muslim bin al-Hajjaj, and al-Naysaburiy. “Sahih Muslim, Juz 1.” Kairo: Mathba’ah ‘Isa al-Babiy al-Halabiy, 1955.

Al-Sijistaniy, Abu Dawud Sulaiman bin al-Asy’ats. “Sunan Abi Dawud, Juz 1.” Beirut: Al-Maktabah al-‘Ashriyyah, 1431.

Al-Tirmidzi, Abu ‘Isa Muhammad bin ‘Isa. “Sunan Al-Tirmidzi, Juz 1.” Beirut: Dar al-Gharb al-Islamiy, 1431.

Amrulloh, Muhammad Habib Al Ansori, Umar Ali, Mohammad Muksi. “Aneka Metode Dan Pendekatan Dalam Studi Hadis.” Ushuly: Jurnal Ilmu Ushuluddin II, no. 2 (2023): 161–83. https://doi.org/10.52431/ushuly.v2i2.2354.

An-Nawawi, Abi Zakariya Yahya bin Syaraf. Al-Majmu’ Syarh Al Muhadzab Li as-Syairazi. Jeddah: Maktabah al-irsyad, n.d.

Asqalani, Ahmad bin Ali bin Hajr al. Hadyu as Sari Muqaddimah Fath Al Bari. MAktabah Salafiyyah, n.d.

Bukhari, Muhammad bin Ismail Al. Shahih Al Bukhari. dar ibnu Katsir, 2002.

Darmalaksana, Wahyudin. “Metode Penelitian Kualitatif Studi Pustaka Dan Studi Lapangan.” Pre-Print Digital Library UIN Sunan Gunung Djati Bandung, 2020, 1–6.

Fatihunnada, Afaf Nazrat Uyun. “Kontekstualisasi Hadis Doa Pengalihan Hujan Pendekatan Geografis Jakarta Menurut Ali Mustafa Yaqub.” Ilmu Ushuluddin 7, no. 1 (2020): 37–56. https://doi.org/10.15408/iu.v.

Idha Fadhilah Saofyan, Wiwik Permatasari, Muhammad amin Sahib, Abd. Rahman Sakka. “Kajian Metode Kritik Matan Hadis.” Jawami’ul Kalim: Jurnal Kajian Hadis 1, no. 1 (2023): 79–89. https://doi.org/10.36701/jawamiulkalim.v1i1.987.

Imtyas, Rizkiyatul. “Metode Kritik Sanad Dan Matan.” Ushuluna: Jurnal Ilmu Ushuluddin 4, no. 1 (2018): 18–32.

Ismail, Syuhudi. “Kaidah Kesahihan Sanad Hadis.” Jakarta: Bulan Bintang, 2014.

Majah, Abu ‘Abdillah Muhammd bin Yazid ibn. “Sunan Ibn Majah.” Saudi: Dar al-Shiddiq li al-Nasyr, 2014.

Muhammad Fikri Akbari, Hairul Hudaya, hadizhatul Muawwarah. “Metode Kritik Matam Hadis Perspektif Ulama Hadis.” Al-Falah: Jurnal Ilmiah Keislaman Dan Kemasyarakatan 25, no. 1 (2025): 16–17.

Nasir, Ridhwan. “Ulumul Hadits Dan Musthalah Hadis.” Jombang: Darul Hikmah, 2004.

Rahman, Andi. Pendekatan-Pendekatan Dalam Memahami Hadis. 1st ed. Jakarta Selatan: Program Studi Ilmu Al-Qur’an dan Tafsir Fakultas: Ushuluddin Institut PTIQ Jakarta, 2023.

Ramadhani, Diah, Rey Al, and Hafiz Munthe. “Pendekatan Geografis Pada Hadis Arah Kiblat: Telaah Pemikiran Ali Mustafa Yaqub.” Tashdiq 13, no. 3 (2025): 3. https://doi.org/doi.org/10.3783/tashdiqv2i9.2461.

Suryadilaga, Suryadi dan Muhammad Alfatih. Metodologi Penelitian Hadis. Yogyakarta: Yogyakarta: TH-Press, 2012.

Ulfah Zakiyah, Muhammad Ghifari. “Tujuan Dan Urgensi Penelitian Hadis.” AL-ISNAD: Journal of Indonesian Hadist Studies 3, no. 1 (2022): 65–72.

Yaqub, Ali Mustafa. Cara Benar Memahami Hadis. 1st ed. Tangerang Selatan: Yayasan Wakaf Darus-Sunah Unit Penerbitan Maktabah Darus-Sunah, 2024.

Yusi Yuliandini, Hidayati. “Kontribusi KH. Ali Mustafa Yaqub Mengkontekstualisasikan Hadis Di Indonesia.” Dirayah: Jurnal Ilmu Hadis 2, no. 2 (2024): 274.